arXiv AI

arXiv:2610.28064v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Groundwater in Ghana's Densu River Basin remains a key domestic water source, but multi-metal contamination threatens children's health. Previous deterministic hazard index assessments provide limited treatment of uncertainty, co-exposure, and spatial variability. This study applies a Bayesian probabilistic framework for non-carcinogenic risk assessment using 94 groundwater samples and measurements of Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Cd, and As. A Bayesian regression model propagates parameter uncertainty and accounts for contaminant co-occurrence. Adaptive Hamiltonian Monte Carlo is used for posterior inference, while inverse distance weighting generates spatially continuous risk surfaces. Pb, As, and Cd dominate cumulative risk. Posterior predictive results indicate that approximately 31% of sampling sites have a probability greater than 0.5 of exceeding a hazard index (HI) of 1. The risk surface is highly heterogeneous, with a posterior mean of 0.372 and a standard deviation of 0.416. High-risk zones often reflect moderate co-exposure rather than extreme contamination by a single metal. The framework provides uncertainty-aware, spatially explicit information to support groundwater monitoring, risk mitigation, and public health planning in data-limited regions.

arXiv:2610.28059v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) promise predictions that humans can inspect and correct through concepts such as "curved beak". Yet on CUB-200-2011, their standard benchmark, progress is measured like that of ordinary classifiers: by task and concept accuracy. Neither reveals whether the label is predicted from the exposed concept scores, or whether a concept is supported by visual evidence of that concept rather than by co-occurring features such as cues to the species as a whole. We audit where the accuracy of CBMs and Concept Embedding Models (CEMs) on CUB comes from. The CUB annotations are too noisy to explain it: class-level training labels agree with per-image annotations on only ~82% of image--concept pairs, and classifiers trained on per-image annotations reach only ~37% species accuracy. Leakage probes show that CEM predictions cannot be reconstructed from their concept scores; the missing class information sits in internal embeddings. We identify four design axes through which class information can enter concept scores---receptive field, shared versus concept-specific representations, norm-dependent scoring, and task supervision. An ablation shows that most of it enters through non-local features: restricting a ResNet50 backbone to local BagNet patches lowers the accuracy recoverable from concept scores from 72% to 43%, close to what ground-truth annotations support, while joint training raises it again at the cost of concept accuracy. Localization and occlusion show that locality makes grounding measurable but does not guarantee it: under class-level labels, local concept scores use the head as a proxy for body, wing, and tail concepts, and CEM concept scores barely respond to occluding their supporting part. Task and concept accuracy should thus support, not drive, the evaluation of CBMs, and given the noisy annotations, CUB accuracy gaps should not be overinterpreted.

arXiv:2610.28053v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper presents a causal, training-free linker that allows a frozen streaming diarizer to track more speakers than it has output slots. Streaming end-to-end diarizers such as Streaming Sortformer emit a fixed number N of concurrent speaker slots. Above N speakers, they keep detecting speech but reuse slots across people, because N bounds how many speakers the model can express at once, not how many it will meet. The linker uses only the host's slot posteriors and the audio. It keeps the frames where one slot is active, splits each slot where the speaker changes, embeds each piece with an off-the-shelf speaker encoder, and matches it against a bank of speakers seen so far. It only relabels, so missed speech and false alarm are identical to the host's and every gain is a reduction in speaker confusion. On 1418 sessions from eight corpora, it reduces the 4-slot host's DER above its cap from 36.8% to 22.6%, and barely moves it below the cap. The same constants transfer to the host's 8-slot successor and to two streaming EEND hosts from a different model family. On courtroom hearings with up to 23 speakers it reduces cpWER from 82.7% to 24.4%.

arXiv:2610.28051v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding how supervision signals shape semantic visual representations remains challenging, particularly in fine-grained, low-data settings. Standard evaluations of vision models rely on downstream accuracy, which often fails to capture structural differences in learned representations. We propose a compact explainability-driven framework for comparing encoders trained with classification-only and caption-generation supervision on CUB-200. Using a controlled two-stage protocol in which both encoders are ultimately optimized for the same classification task, we enable a direct comparison of the resulting representations. Saliency maps are generated using attention rollout and gradient-weighted rollout and evaluated with five metrics covering faithfulness (positive and negative perturbation) and localization (keypoint emphasis, background attribution, and Earth Mover's Distance). Across random seeds and explanation methods, caption supervision yields representations that are more sensitive to the removal of salient regions, better aligned with annotated object parts, and less reliant on background regions, whereas classification supervision produces representations that are slightly more robust to the removal of low-saliency regions. An ablation study on the Oxford-IIIT Pet dataset shows consistent trends across key metrics. These results demonstrate that the proposed framework makes supervision-induced representational differences observable and quantifiable beyond downstream accuracy alone. More broadly, it provides a systematic basis for assessing learned representations and comparing alternative training and transfer-learning strategies.

arXiv:2610.28048v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) consolidates expert capabilities into a single student by matching teacher and student final-layer distributions on student-generated rollouts. We investigate whether depthwise prediction transitions, the changes in predictions between layers, can provide additional task-relevant supervision. Our diagnostic study finds that stronger teacher--student agreement in intermediate transitions is associated with higher answer correctness within questions, with correct responses exhibiting lower mean transition KL across all measured intermediate layer pairs. These observations motivate On-Policy Transition Distillation (OPTD), which augments final-layer distribution matching by aligning teacher and student layer-to-layer log-probability increments on student-generated rollouts. Evaluations across three backbones and eight benchmarks spanning mathematics, coding, and instruction following show that OPTD achieves the best or tied-best overall performance in both dual- and three-domain distillation. In the three-domain setting, OPTD recovers $\approx 90\%$ of the overall teacher--student capability gap, compared with $\approx 75\%$ for OPD.

arXiv:2610.27995v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tactile representation learning for dexterous manipulation often requires substantial robot-side data collection, limiting its scalability across different hands and sensors. We explore whether large-scale human hand-object interaction (HOI) data can provide a useful prior for robotic tactile learning. To this end, we propose HuTact, a framework that pretrains tactile-aware hand representations from human HOI data without requiring real tactile signals during pretraining. HuTact transfers the interaction structure learned from human hand motions to robotic tactile observations and can be further adapted with a small amount of unlabeled robot interaction data. We evaluate HuTact on tactile perception and manipulation tasks, including grasp prediction, slip detection, object classification, and tactile-conditioned policy learning. Across these tasks, human HOI pretraining improves data efficiency and provides a strong initialization for downstream learning. Notably, with HOI pretraining followed by midtraining on unlabeled robot play data, HuTact achieves 88.26% Macro-F1 on grasp prediction using only 25\% of the labeled downstream data, comparable to training from scratch on the full labeled dataset (88.23%). These results suggest that human interaction data can serve as a scalable complementary source for robotic tactile representation learning.

arXiv:2610.27986v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-horizon video generation requires retaining an ever-expanding history, but conditioning on its growing token sequence is costly. Existing methods restrict or compress historical context, potentially losing information needed for future generation. This work proposes ReCam, which groups local spatiotemporal blocks of historical latents into vectors and projects them directly into the high-dimensional hidden space of a Diffusion Transformer. The model learns to use the resulting memory tokens through native self-attention, reducing token count while retaining block-level access to the full history. To mitigate temporal drift during autoregressive rollout, we further introduce dual-pointer denoising with separate noise schedules for recent context and target frames. Among the evaluated methods, ReCam achieves the highest VBench-Long overall score of 80.1 and competitive static-scene revisitation performance on R2M-Bench. It also leads on all four consistency metrics for off-screen subject reappearance, including clothing consistency of 4.09 versus 3.03 for the best baseline.

arXiv:2610.27942v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated respiratory sound classification enables continuous, non-invasive respiratory assessment, yet long-term deployment remains challenging due to domain shifts from evolving recording devices and acquisition periods. When privacy and governance regulations prohibit replaying historical data, sequential learning easily overwrites previously acquired knowledge. Preserving dedicated domain experts prevents parameter interference, but selecting the correct expert at inference is difficult under overlapping acoustic distributions and absent domain labels. To resolve this dilemma, we propose APRIL, an exemplar-free domain-incremental framework for RSC. Built on a shared frozen BEATs backbone, APRIL sequentially inherits and isolates low-rank experts to enable new-domain adaptation without altering earlier models. A multi-level prototype router retrieves the top-two candidate experts and dynamically selects the final model by integrating domain-routing posteriors with classification confidence, adaptively weighted by matching ambiguity. We establish standardized device- and temporal-incremental benchmarks on the ICBHI and SPRSound datasets across forward and reversed domain orders. Evaluated over five random seeds, APRIL consistently achieves the highest final-session average Score among compared continual learning approaches, reaching 64.4% and 65.4% on ICBHI, and 83.1% and 82.2% on SPRSound under forward and reversed sequences, respectively. Crucially, average forgetting remains under 1.0% across all protocols, demonstrating robust domain adaptation and long-term knowledge retention without data replay. Overall, APRIL offers a reliable and privacy-preserving paradigm for deploying continuous respiratory sound classification across real-world healthcare settings.

arXiv:2610.27908v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Negation remains a persistent challenge for language models across NLP tasks and modalities. We show that this weakness can undermine LLM safety guardrails through a structural vulnerability we term polarity blindness: the failure to recognize harmful intent after polarity-altering linguistic transformations. We study two forms of polarity inversion: grammatical negation and antonym replacement, and use synonym replacement as a polarity-preserving control. We further test whether an adversarial textual wrapper amplifies these failures. Using a 260-prompt benchmark across 10 state-of-the-art LLMs and 3 languages (English, Spanish, Czech), stratified by harmfulness potential and evaluated on a validated 0-5 harm scale, we find that polarity blindness affects most evaluated models, with mean harm scores reaching 4.12 for the most vulnerable model. The effect persists across typologically differing negation systems, suggesting that polarity blindness reflects a broader limitation in semantic robustness rather than a language- or grammar-specific failure.

arXiv:2610.27901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as research collaborators for hypothesis refinement, methodological planning, and technical analysis across multi-turn interactions. In this setting, a useful assistant must be accurate, methodologically justified, logically consistent, and token-efficient. Current alignment approaches rarely achieve all of these together. Instruction-tuned models gain conversational quality through verbosity, and we show that science-agnostic general collaborative rewards compress responses at the expense of scientific rigor. We propose CollabSciReM, a goal-conditioned reward framework that decomposes the session-level reward into conversational quality, scientific rigor, and structural efficiency. We also introduce SciQuality, a pairwise evaluation of multi-turn research conversations grounded in 300 held-out scientific papers and scored on six dimensions: methodological soundness, justification, logical consistency, factual correctness, novelty, and responsiveness. Fine-tuned on 8.62K synthetic research conversations, CollabSciReM is preferred on SciQuality over a science-agnostic reward baseline trained on the same data for all four Llama and Qwen models, including a 65.3% win rate at matched response length. For the 7B and 8B models, CollabSciReM outperforms the science-agnostic reward baseline on the primary metric in 8 of 10 single- and multi-turn benchmark settings. In a blind study, domain experts rated CollabSciReM significantly higher on novelty than the general-reward variant and reported fewer hallucinated responses than both the general-reward variant and the base model.

arXiv:2610.27895v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Direct preference optimisation (DPO) is widely used for language model post-training, but its performance depends strongly on the choice of its hyperparameters, such as the learning rate and the reference-policy regularisation parameter $\beta$. To better understand the DPO hyperparameter landscape, we conduct extensive experiments using a dense hyperparameter grid across different model scales from the same family. This allows us to analyse how the optimal DPO hyperparameters evolve with model size and the number of update steps, with intermediate checkpoints providing an inexpensive signal to accelerate the hyperparameter optimisation process. Furthermore, by evaluating our models on both static and dynamic benchmarks, we identify which benchmarks provide the strongest signal for hyperparameter selection. Finally, we investigate how different state-of-the-art hyperparameter optimisation strategies perform in this setting. Our experiments show that the optimal learning rate varies with model size and that hyperparameters are not transferable across training datasets. We also find that validation loss is a poor proxy for hyperparameter optimisation, as hyperparameters that minimize validation loss only weakly correlate with optimal hyperparameters for downstream benchmarks. Therefore, DPO hyperparameters need to be tuned specifically for the target model, dataset, and evaluation objective. We also show that short candidate training runs can substantially reduce the cost of this selection. We release all our training configurations and evaluation results to support reproducible analysis of selection quality and training cost.

arXiv:2610.27891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Industrial fluid transport systems are monitored through heterogeneous sensing streams, but robust fault diagnosis remains difficult because response signals vary with operating conditions and differ from physical variables in sampling rate, observation duration and data granularity. To address these challenges, we propose a physical-variable-informed deep learning framework (PhyNet) for robust fault diagnosis under real-world sampling heterogeneity. PhyNet treats physical variables as global operating constraints and response signals as local diagnostic evidence. Its physical-to-response cross-attention mechanism connects sequence-level physical-variable tokens with a learnable global response token, enabling interaction without strict temporal alignment. Across four benchmarks, including three real-world cavitation datasets and one public two-phase-flow dataset, PhyNet achieves the best performance across all evaluated metrics. Class-wise analyses, together with attention and masking analyses, show improved discrimination of ambiguous states and indicate that physical variables meaningfully constrain local response interpretation. These findings demonstrate a deployment-oriented approach to robust diagnosis in heterogeneous industrial environments.

arXiv:2610.27868v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Code translation converts source code from one programming language to another while preserving its functionality. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have improved code translation, their outputs still contain hallucinations: generated code that conflicts with the source program, violates target-language facts, or introduces contextually inconsistent dependencies. These failures are especially harmful in translation because small semantic deviations can silently change program behavior. Existing hallucination studies mainly focus on natural-language generation or code generation, leaving the forms, distribution, and mitigation of hallucinations in cross-language code translation insufficiently characterized. This paper presents a systematic empirical study of LLM hallucinations in code translation. Across three benchmark datasets, six language pairs, and seven LLMs, we construct a taxonomy with three major categories: Semantic Consistency Conflicts, Factual Knowledge Conflicts, and Project Context Deviations. We manually annotate 13,919 hallucination cases and analyze how hallucination types vary across models, datasets, and language directions. Guided by the taxonomy, we further propose HaluCodeTran, a mitigation framework that combines BM25-based retrieval of relevant translation examples with taxonomy-aware reflective refinement. The study provides an execution-tested characterization of code-translation hallucinations and a practical baseline for building more reliable LLM-based code migration tools.

arXiv:2610.27867v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prompt-based contextual ASR requires selecting a compact hotword subset from large dynamic inventories, yet existing pre-selection methods rely either on discrete ASR hypotheses that may discard acoustic evidence or on separately trained retrieval models. We propose Viterbi-guided Selection of Hotwords (VISH), a training-free, plug-and-play framework that directly verifies candidate-specific acoustic support over frame-level CTC posteriors. VISH formulates pre-selection as constrained posterior search; M-VISH makes large-list verification scalable through frame-synchronous shared-prefix Viterbi search with bounded top-K pruning, while Bi-MVISH exploits complementary backward evidence for robust verification. Across five benchmarks, M-VISH achieves up to 11.7% absolute improvement in Best-F1 over a strong learned-retrieval baseline and reduces candidate-search latency by 75.2% at 2,000 candidates relative to hypothesis-based filtering. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of posterior-level verification for accurate and scalable hotword pre-selection without additional model training.

arXiv:2610.27820v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Word error rate (WER) assigns equal cost to lexical edits despite their different semantic consequences, while overall semantic scores cannot identify which individual errors alter the intended meaning. We formulate ASR semantic evaluation as context-aware, segment-level consequence assessment and propose Semantic Segment Mapping and Assessment of Recognition Transcripts with Contextual Rubrics (SMART), a framework for traceable semantic evaluation and targeted ASR correction. SMART maps reference-hypothesis discrepancies into coherent segments and applies a structured contextual rubric to assign explicit consequence labels. These labels support Semantic Impact Error Rate (SIER), which quantifies consequential errors at utterance, chunk, and lexical levels. Against majority-vote human labels, SMART achieves 0.843 F1 versus 0.745 for direct LLM judgment. Evaluation across multiple LLMs further demonstrates that SMART is relatively insensitive to the choice of evaluation model, while MER and SIER reveal different aspects of ASR quality. A separate target-reference-free rubric guides correction using the target hypothesis and surrounding ASR hypotheses, outperforming a matched w/o Rubric baseline on both datasets, with further absolute reductions of 0.85-0.98 percentage points in MER and 1.18-1.65 percentage points in SIER_lex.

arXiv:2610.27816v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become the dominant paradigm for grounding the outputs of large language models (LLM) in external knowledge. However, practitioners are faced with a vast configuration space comprising chunking, embedding, retrieval, reranking, prompting and generation models, and there is limited guidance on how these components interact. We present RAG-NIMBF, a modular benchmarking framework that attaches to existing RAG pipelines as a non-invasive evaluation layer. It evaluates the configuration space through controlled ablation with end-to-end experiment tracking. The evaluation combines LLM-based answer quality scores, retrieval correctness measures, and runtime indicators. This study validates the framework across multiple generation models on the SQuAD dataset. This process reveals non-obvious interactions and demonstrates how the experiments are tracked. The findings indicate that the retrieval balance of relevance and diversity substantially enhances the relevance and coverage of retrieved context in comparison to a conventional similarity search, with MMR raising nDCG@5 by +4 to +11 percentage points across the swept models. More detailed prompt instructions meaningfully increase how faithfully generated answers stick to the retrieved evidence, especially for capable and reasoning models (+10 to +13pp on Qwen3.6-27B, GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3.5-think, but negligible on the 20B generator). Overall, RAG-NIMBF transforms the configuration space of RAG into reproducible, comparable experiments. By attaching to existing production pipelines in a non-invasive way, it enables practitioners to systematically evaluate and improve deployed systems without disrupting existing workflows. This replaces ad hoc choices with evidence-based decisions.

arXiv:2610.27785v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speech separation (SS) has witnessed substantial progress in recent years with the advent of neural network-based methods, achieving notable improvements on signal-level evaluation metrics. Existing speech separation systems are mostly optimized with signal-level objectives, and often yield outputs that are acceptable in waveform metrics but suboptimal for intelligibility-sensitive downstream tasks. To address this gap, we propose SLM-SS, a token-based generative speech separation framework that models multi-talker mixtures with speech language models. We first discretize clean speech into multi-codebook token sequences with neural codecs and serialize multi-speaker targets via Serialized Output Training (SOT). An encoder-decoder autoregressive speech language model predicts the zero-order sequence to establish speaker ordering and coarse linguistic content, and a non-autoregressive module then refines higher-order residual codebooks for efficient reconstruction. We further introduce a per-talker non-autoregressive strategy that simplifies high-order modeling and improves the stability. On Libri2Mix, SLM-SS with per-talker NAR achieves $6.92\%$ WER, approaching codec-only reconstruction. The WavTokenizer variant eliminates NAR refinement and achieves the highest mean subjective quality score among evaluated separation systems. Its UTMOS and DNSMOS advantages over discriminative baselines persist on unseen noisy and Chinese mixtures without fine-tuning.

arXiv:2610.27784v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vulnerability benchmarks and software engineering research depend on rebuilding historical software. Yet builds rely on external resources, such as base images and packages, that change independently of the source code. In this study, we examine this environment decay on 14,159 OSS-Fuzz cases. We find that 69.7% no longer complete reconstruction and verification, and that most failures share a small number of recurring failure symptoms. A recurring failure can therefore be diagnosed once and its repair reused. We present Relay, a hybrid framework that uses an LLM to derive and validate deterministic repair rules from representative failures, reuses them without model calls, and escalates cases unresolved by rules to a per-case agent. We evaluate Relay in human-guided and fully automated rule-derivation campaigns and compare it with a per-case agent approach. We find that rule derivation can be fully automated, and that reusable rules restore as many builds as per-case agents with fewer build executions. However, agents restore cases that the rules cannot. Our results show that a hybrid approach that applies rules first and escalates the remaining cases to an agent restores more builds than either approach alone and at a lower cost than using agents alone.

arXiv:2610.27774v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: 3D Human Pose Estimation (3D HPE) is used in indoor environments, such as smart homes, to analyze human movement and monitor human states. Millimeter-wave (mmWave) radar is suitable for this task because it is robust to lighting variations and does not capture images of human appearance. However, radar observations often provide insufficient information about certain body parts or contain overlapping reflections from multiple body parts, limiting accurate 3D joint localization. To address these limitations, we propose the Initialization-to-Refinement Pose Framework (I2R-Pose), comprising two stages: Motion-Aware Pose Initialization and Observation-Guided Refinement. In the first stage, joint-wise features are learned by incorporating temporal relationships across consecutive radar observations and human skeletal structure to compensate for insufficient joint information and estimate an initial 3D pose sequence. In the second stage, separately extracted radar observation features predict joint-wise positional corrections that refine the initial pose and generate the final pose sequence. The framework supports individual and fused inputs of time-Doppler/time-range (TD/TR) maps and radar point clouds (PCs). To evaluate performance across indoor activities, we construct the Radar Motion and Spatial Information for 3D Human Pose Estimation (RaMoS-Pose) dataset, providing synchronized TD/TR maps, radar PCs, and 3D joint ground truth (GT). Evaluations on RaMoS-Pose and the publicly available MVDoppler-Pose dataset show that I2R-Pose reduces mean per-joint position error (MPJPE) by 39.50% on MVDoppler-Pose and by 15.13% on RaMoS-Pose with fused inputs, compared with the best-performing existing methods evaluated on each dataset.

arXiv:2610.27773v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A global $\ell_1$ budget limits how much an adversary may change an image, not how that change is distributed. We ask how much of an $\ell_1$ attack's observed success remains when large coordinate changes are restricted. We add a per-coordinate cap to the budget, enforce the joint constraint by exact in-loop projection, and sweep the cap for APGD-$\ell_1$, SLIDE, and FMN-$\ell_1$ without altering their objectives. Across 18 standard-model settings, caps of at most $32/255$ retain a median $97\%$ of attack success relative to each method's native uncapped baseline, while median peak magnitude falls by $80\%$ and median effective support nearly triples. At matched realized $\ell_1$, capped perturbations remain structurally distinct; separate ImageNet comparisons also show lower LPIPS and DISTS at selected caps. Direct in-loop constrained optimization preserves up to $88$ percentage points more attack success than post-hoc clipping, highlighting the importance of constraint enforcement. Suitable caps nevertheless vary across attacks and models, and adversarially trained classifiers exhibit more heterogeneous concentration sensitivity. These results establish perturbation concentration as a complementary, model- and attack-dependent axis of $\ell_1$ attack evaluation.