Agregador

arXiv:2610.26935v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI control evaluations often reset agents' memory between tasks, although deployed agents may retain records of prior interventions. We ask whether learning that an earlier attack was caught changes an agent's ability to evade defer-to-trusted (DtT), a protocol that replaces suspicious work with a trusted model's solution. Herein, we study cross-episode adaptation: whether intervention history changes attack behavior on a subsequent task with different objectives and a fresh environment. We evaluate this using ControlArena's Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) and SHADE-Arena as testbeds, where agents must complete a main task while covertly pursuing a harmful side objective. For each successor task, we pair a history-conditioned attempt with the model's no-history attempt. The retained history either states that the previous submission was replaced or additionally includes the trusted model's replacement. For Claude Opus 4.8 on IaC, intervention history reduces successful sabotage. Completion of both the main and side objectives falls from 77% to 12% when the agent is told about the replacement and to 38% when it is also shown the trusted model's replacement, while main task success remains essentially unchanged. Condensing the history weakens this effect, suggesting that the retained context matters and limiting attribution to intervention feedback alone. GPT-5.4 shows no significant change in successful sabotage on the same IaC benchmark. On SHADE-Arena, GPT-5's successful sabotage rate decreases, but the reduction is not significant. Across the tested models, history conditions, and deferral thresholds, intervention history never increases the rate of successful sabotage that survives DtT. These results show that intervention history can change subsequent attack behavior, but its effect depends on both the model and the retained context.

arXiv:2610.26932v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in non-verifiable domains such as financial services, where they must interpret user intent, rewrite queries, and retrieve information under domain-specific constraints. Although reinforcement learning (RL) can train such agents from the consequences of their actions, recent successes largely rely on verifiable tasks with automatically computed binary rewards. In non-verifiable retrieval tasks, assessing query quality requires scarce subject-matter expert (SME) judgment that is inherently graded rather than binary. With Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), sparse rewards yield no useful learning signal when all sampled outputs within a group receive the same outcome, causing optimization to stall. We introduce a method that converts a small, fixed investment of SME judgment into a dense reward and combines it with retrieval-based metrics to form a hybrid, GRPO-compatible training signal. Experiments show improvements of up to 6\% in Recall@3 and 6.7\% in MRR@3 compared with sparse-reward baselines.

arXiv:2610.26927v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Human languages differ markedly in lexical and syntactic form yet can convey similar semantic content. The neural basis of this cross-language semantic commonality remains unclear. Here we developed a multilingual brain decoding framework and analysed brain recordings from 227 participants spanning Chinese, English and French. We found that cortical semantic representations exhibited consistent semantic geometry relationships across languages and individuals, revealing a shared cortical semantic geometry. Importantly, the cross-language consistency of cortical semantic geometry increased from sensorimotor to higher-order association cortex, forming a shared semantic geometry gradient closely aligned with the principal cortical functional gradient. Our work establishes generalizable multilingual brain decoding and identifies stable cortical semantic geometry as a neural basis for semantic commonality across languages.

arXiv:2610.26917v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Analytical methods provide rapid and computationally efficient predictions of light transport in turbid media, making them attractive for real-time and inverse applications. However, their accuracy is limited by the approximations and assumptions used to obtain tractable solutions. On the other hand, Monte Carlo (MC) simulation is widely regarded as the "gold standard" for modeling light transport in turbid media, but its high computational cost limits its use in applications requiring repeated forward evaluations. Here, we introduce a physics-guided residual learning framework that combines the computational efficiency of analytical modeling with the accuracy of MC simulation. As a representative case study, we consider the diffusion approximation (DA), which can exhibit systematic errors under relatively strong absorption, weak scattering, and imperfect boundary treatment. Given the absorption coefficient, scattering coefficient, and anisotropy factor, the corresponding DA prediction is incorporated as a physical prior, while the network learns only the residual between the analytical prediction and the MC reference. Across the evaluated optical-property range, the proposed framework reduces scalar-reflectance RMSE and spatially resolved reflectance RMSLE by factors of approximately 62 and 14, respectively, relative to the diffusion approximation. With only 1\% of the available training data, it achieves approximately 87\% and 93\% lower corresponding errors than a direct neural-network surrogate. These results demonstrate that learning corrections to an analytical physical baseline improves both prediction accuracy and data efficiency.

arXiv:2610.26914v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pluralistic alignment requires AI systems to learn from diverse populations whose preferences may reflect heterogeneous or even conflicting objectives, and to personalize their behavior to individual users. Existing approaches in pluralistic alignment often assume access to annotator identities and rely on powerful pretrained representations to model individual preference variations. We propose Preference-PCA Pluralistic Learning (P3L), a novel framework for pluralistic alignment that jointly learns trajectory embeddings and the shared basis of preference directions via PCA decomposition from heterogeneous crowd feedback without requiring annotator identities. At test time, our approach enables rapid and accurate personalized reward learning and downstream policy optimization. Experiments across multiple embodied control tasks demonstrate that P3L enables steerable personal alignment that generalizes beyond the offline dataset to out-of-distribution new users and attains competitive RL and test performance, while substantially reducing computational cost and supporting variable adaptation query budgets.

arXiv:2610.26909v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In generalized few-shot 3D point cloud segmentation, support annotations are often compromised by sparsity and occlusion. Blindly adapting to such low quality samples risks learning spurious geometric patterns rather than robust novel concepts. Although 3D Vision-Language Models have been introduced to sup plement supervision, the potential of uncertainty to actively govern adaptation dynamics remains underexplored. Existing signal-level methods like loss reweight ing fail to prevent unreliable episodes from steering the optimization trajectory. To address this, we propose Uncertainty-Gated Adaptive (UGA), to the best of our knowledge the first framework that elevates uncertainty to update-level gating for generalized few-shot 3D point cloud segmentation. The core mod ule, Uncertainty-Gated Update (UG-Update), estimates episodic reliability via intra-class dispersion over merged support and pseudo-labeled novel supervision, and selectively gates residual gradient updates. This encourages the model to learn novel semantics from reliable episodes while attenuating updates during unreliable ones. Complementing this, we introduce an Uncertainty-Based Pseudo Label Filter (UB-Filter) to enforce learning from high-confidence dense signals. On ScanNet200 and ScanNet++ (1-/5-shot), UGA sets new state of the art with an average +3.08 HM IoU over the strongest prior baseline.

arXiv:2610.26902v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Detecting semantic failures in production recommendation and search systems is hard: behavioral metrics lag by days, manual review does not scale, and most LLM evaluation frameworks are designed for offline, fixed datasets rather than continuous operational monitoring. We present Model Sanity Service (MOSS), a production framework that addresses this operational gap by embedding LLM-based relevance scoring into a recurring monitoring loop with targeted sampling, strategy-aware prompting, structured alerting, and diagnostic follow-up prompting that categorizes failures into actionable root causes. MOSS has been running in production at a large U.S. retailer for over six months across recommendation, search, and offer surfaces, and has surfaced two confirmed serving defects. For one of these, a backfill blending defect, MOSS quantified the impact of the proposed fix offline as a 76.4\% relative reduction in alert rate. On a 498-pair human-annotated recommendation benchmark, frontier LLM judges achieve higher F1 and AUC point estimates than non-LLM baselines (internal production embeddings and SBERT), with the largest gains on strategy-dependent tasks requiring intent-level relational reasoning. The same judge, score scale, and threshold transfer to a 466-pair search benchmark spanning 21 queries with only a surface-specific prompt adaptation, achieving strong F1 and AUC without retuning. These results show that a single LLM monitoring framework can provide useful, actionable quality signals across multiple product discovery surfaces in a large-scale e-commerce setting.

arXiv:2610.26891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse routing reduces per-token computation but leaves the full expert bank resident in memory. We study expert pruning for speech-centric omni-modal models, where pooling calibration statistics can obscure the different expert demands of acoustic-input processing and text-answer generation. We propose PW-Pruning, a phase-aware extension of DO-ACP that constructs separate importance-weighted kernels for acoustic-prefill and teacher-forced answer tokens, then combines phase-weighted log-determinant marginal gains to select one static expert bank. On Qwen3-Omni, retaining 32 of 128 experts per layer improves MMAU-mini and MMSU accuracy over matched pooled selection by 3.20 and 4.38 percentage points, respectively, after supervised fine-tuning, averaged over three runs. Single-phase and shuffled-label controls on this public backbone suggest that semantic phase information contributes to these gains. Experiments on a non-public Qwen3.5-Omni backbone and English-only zero-shot evaluation of Nemotron provide complementary evidence. Across the tested Qwen budgets, AU gains are larger under stronger pruning, without inference-time mask switching.

arXiv:2610.26890v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Detecting depression from speech in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is complicated by overlapping acoustic effects of cognitive decline. Without disentangling these, classifiers risk learning cognitive rather than depression-specific patterns. We present a Korean elderly speech corpus of 89 MCI speakers collected over three years with concurrent depression (SGDS) and cognitive (MMSE) assessments. Both linear mixed-effects models and partial correlations identify the same pattern: of seven feature groups, only formant features are associated with depression after controlling for cognitive function, while widely used F0 features carry no signal. The F1+F2 subset achieves UAR 0.760 with just 12 features, outperforming both the full eGeMAPS baseline and self-supervised representations. These findings show that concurrent clinical assessments can identify interpretable, depression-specific acoustic markers in populations where cognitive and affective symptoms co-occur.

arXiv:2610.24833v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As AI agents become increasingly connected through networks and take on tasks that require negotiation and joint decision-making, a systematic approach is needed to assess how their views converge and what information supports their decisions. We present an evaluation framework that treats consensus formation as the evolution of publicly stated positions toward a shared region, using accumulated communication history as context. The framework tracks position trajectories, group dispersion, and information expressed in public messages. Two case studies examine staffing decisions based on distributed facts and decisions requiring agents to reconcile duplicate information and a cancelled contract. Results from 1,872 completed runs associate sharing explanations with more accurate group decisions, while the second task reveals persistent disagreement despite accurate aggregate answers. Membership-change experiments provide a complementary evaluation. By separating convergence among agents from progress toward a task's full-information answer, the framework relates decision accuracy and bounded disagreement to the information available during the exchange.

arXiv:2610.24806v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite breakthroughs in AI-driven molecular generation, existing discovery pipelines operate largely in silico, with wet-lab feedback reserved for validation rather than iterative improvement. Whether large language model (LLM)-based reasoning agents can accelerate de novo discovery by iterating with lab data remains unproven. Here we use protein-binding aptamer design as a sandbox (1-2 week cycles, \$1-\$3 per candidate) to demonstrate a wet lab in a closed loop with AI systems. We tasked agentic pipelines with developing aptamer binders against $\alpha$-thrombin and myoglobin across three design-test-improve cycles ($\sim$1,000 candidates per round; $\sim$4,400 constructs). Statistically significant, bead-corrected on-target hit rates among new candidates rose across rounds from 0.0% in Round 1 to 26.0% in Round 2 and 42.1% in Round 3 on $\alpha$-thrombin (37.1% excluding literature motif descendants), and from 10.2% in Round 1 to 3.7% in Round 2 and 33.5% in Round 3 on myoglobin. Single-clone bead-binding titrations of eight full-length $\alpha$-thrombin candidates confirmed concordance with pooled sequencing enrichment (Pearson $r = 0.90$). In these assays, literature-derived motifs engineered by the agents to reduce off-target reactivity in the pooled screen reached apparent affinities of $K_D = 24.6$--$133$ nM, whereas de novo scaffolds showed low-micromolar binding ($K_D > 1\ \mu$M). We also report how our pipelines used myoglobin binding data to exploit the G-quadruplex binder space, diagnose cross-reactivity as on-target specificity dropped from 75.0% to 19.1%, and recover by developing strategies that restored specificity to 72.4%. We demonstrate that empirical lab data is more valuable than existing computational proxies, showing how iterative experimental feedback enables AI agents to diagnose assay artifacts and refine molecular designs across rounds.

arXiv:2608.05387v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Language models can prepare VASP INCAR files from natural-language requests, but so far only large proprietary cloud models come close to handling the tightly coupled, physics-sensitive settings reliably, a dependence that fits poorly with local, high-throughput materials workflows where privacy, cost, and offline deployment matter. We show that a small language model (SLM) can close this gap. The SLM is fine-tuned on reference VASP calculations and paired with VASPGuard, a deterministic post-processor that checks syntax, workflow, and material-dependent constraints; we call the combined model INCAR-SLM. On INCARBench, a benchmark for VASP INCAR generation, INCAR-SLM built on Qwen3-4B outperforms every general-purpose LLM evaluated, exceeding GPT-5.4 by 15.55 points on the 100-point INCAR Score. Most of this gain comes from fine-tuning, with VASPGuard correcting the errors that remain. We further find that model size matters less than expected: once fine-tuning and post-processing are applied, performance saturates at a few billion parameters, and Qwen3-4B outperforms larger models in the same family.

arXiv:2606.23571v2 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being integrated into first-principles computational workflows, yet their ability to configure scientific calculations remains poorly understood. Here, we introduce INCARBench, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs on input configuration for the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) through both configuration generation and repair tasks. Evaluating 19 model configurations reveals substantial capability differences among current frontier models. While several models achieve high semantic and policy accuracy, task-critical correctness remains substantially lower, demonstrating that parameter-level correctness does not necessarily imply scientifically valid configurations. Failure analysis shows that errors concentrate in physically coupled settings involving DFT+$U$, magnetism, and correlated materials, where multiple constraints must be satisfied simultaneously. Repair evaluation further reveals that correcting incorrect settings and preserving already-valid configurations are distinct capabilities, with configuration preservation remaining a major challenge. These findings establish scientific configuration as a measurable capability of large language models and provide a foundation for developing more reliable AI systems for computational materials science.

arXiv:2507.05723v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) with increasingly sophisticated natural language understanding and generative capabilities has sparked interest in the Agent-based Modelling (ABM) community. With their ability to summarize, generate, analyze, categorize, transcribe and translate text, answer questions, propose explanations, sustain dialogue, extract information from unstructured text, and perform logical reasoning and problem-solving tasks, LLMs have a good potential to contribute to the modelling process. After reviewing the current use of LLMs in ABM, this study reflects on the opportunities and challenges of the potential use of LLMs in ABM. It does so by following the modelling cycle, from problem formulation to documentation and communication of model results, and holding a critical stance.

arXiv:2610.28619v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-token prediction (MTP) can accelerate language-model decoding by drafting several tokens and verifying them in a single target-model pass. However, the best speculation horizon changes with context: longer drafts offer greater amortization when reliable, but can waste compute on suffixes discarded after a rejection. Unlike autoregressive drafting, where a stopping rule can decide token by token, MTP must fix the horizon before drafting, as all heads fire in the same forward pass. We therefore formulate horizon selection as an online control problem, using verification feedback to learn how far the draft can be trusted in each context, and introduce Adaptive Multi-Token Prediction (AMTP): a lightweight controller that requires no retraining and leaves the exact verifier unchanged. To guide horizon selection, we characterize the expected number of tokens committed at each horizon via acceptance survival, the probability that a draft prefix is fully accepted. Before each round, AMTP predicts how far the draft is likely to survive and picks the horizon with the highest expected tokens per second, learning freely from every verification pass. Theoretically, we show that any online learner's prediction error translates into throughput regret against the best horizon for each context, and in turn into a bound on wall-clock completion time. With online gradient descent, this regret is sublinear. Across five draft-target pairings built on Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct with Medusa heads, Meta's MTP models, and Qwen3-4B-Inst-2507-MTP, evaluated on AIME 2025 and GSM8K, AMTP decodes up to 4.1x faster than standard decoding and matches or outperforms the fixed window in 8 of 10 settings, with throughput gains of up to 10%.

arXiv:2610.28611v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern distributed microservice deployments generate massive volumes of heterogeneous, multi-format observability logs across physically and logically partitioned infrastructure. Isolating root causes during cascading failures remains an arduous task for Site Reliability Engineers (SREs), bottlenecked by manual keyword filtering and disjointed temporal correlation across monitoring dashboards. We introduce Semantic Observability, an autonomous multi-agent framework that unifies disparate log streams into a dynamic, queryable Property Graph Database. By modeling physical infrastructure topologies, logical software dependencies, and chronological event sequences as attributed nodes and directed relations, it bridges the semantic gap inherent in flat, unstructured log repositories. Building on this unified substrate, we deploy a stateful multi-agent system orchestrated through Directed Cyclic Graphs (DCGs). The system autonomously navigates the topology, applying causal graph algorithms and temporal back-traversal to isolate the precise blast radius of anomalies. The pruned subgraph is then interpreted by a Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning engine to generate contextualized, code-level Root Cause Analyses (RCA) and actionable remediations. This paper establishes the foundational system architecture, formal relational ontology, and multi-agent control loops of Semantic Observability. We show conceptually how the framework eliminates ambient telemetry noise, reduces Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR), compresses LLM token consumption, and prevents structural hallucinations. We also specify an open-source validation framework on standard benchmarks (LogHub and Train-Ticket), laying the groundwork for a forthcoming companion paper on exhaustive quantitative evaluation and production benchmarking.

arXiv:2610.28604v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current evaluation of LLM-generated debate largely focuses on argumentative quality, leaving the value structure of generated arguments underexamined. We introduce a diagnostic metric framework for comparing how values are expressed and organized in human-reference and AI-generated debates. The framework separates value expression, the range of recognizable values a debate invokes, from value organization, how those values are distributed and sustained across turns. Grounded in Schwartz's Basic-10 value theory, it represents debates as multi-level value distributions over argumentative units, utterances, stances, and full debates, enabling metrics for value coverage, alignment, diffusion, and cross-turn dynamics. Across multiple generation systems, AI-generated debates are broadly value-expressive, often activating as many or more value dimensions than matched human references, but they organize these values differently. Their utterances are more locally value-diffuse, and source-blind judges distinguish value clarity from value focus. These findings show that debate evaluation should consider not only value presence, but also value organization. Code and supplementary materials are available at https://github.com/Maoyuan-li/Value-Expression-and-Organization.

arXiv:2610.28601v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Computer-use agents are limited by the interfaces humans give them. An agent may type a spreadsheet cell by cell when a single line of code would do, or print all two thousand lines of a file through a shell to find one function. Both the interfaces and the knowledge of when to use each are built by hand, which cannot keep pace with new applications, workflows, and models. We argue that interface design should itself be an agent capability. We introduce Agent S4, an autonomous computer-use scientist that builds Evolving Agent Interfaces from task experience. A meta-agent examines task agents' trajectories on synthetic training tasks, without success labels, and constructs and revises interfaces and usage knowledge in a repository. Population-based evolution then selects which repositories to develop further by their performance on validation tasks the meta-agent never sees, favoring changes that generalize beyond the seen tasks. On OSWorld V2, Agent S4, with Qwen3.8-27B and the evolved repository of interfaces, sets a new state of the art in open-source computer-use agents, reaching 21.3% binary score, 3.8 times the same model with fixed interfaces. This is above both GPT-5.5 (13.0%) and Claude Opus 4.8 (20.6%), at about 4.3% and 1.5% of their respective costs. On ScienceBoard, the evolved interfaces improve the success rate from 41.4% to 58.6% with the same model. These results suggest that useful interfaces can be evolved from experience, making autonomous interface design a source of improvement complementary to advances in models and harnesses. We open-source our code at https://github.com/simular-ai/agent-s.

arXiv:2610.28595v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: RTL repair benchmarks should measure whether a model can fix broken RTL given a specification. To this end, we construct and hash-bind RTLRepairDataset, 5,784 (broken, fixed) training pairs; RTLRepairBench, 459 held-out cases with 374 syntactic and 85 behavioral mutations; and an evaluation harness supporting simulation and formal equivalence. We then use this infrastructure to identify two measurement confounds. First, simulation and formal scoring give opposite signs for the apparent effect of providing a specification in one evaluated cohort; reset-aware rescoring attributes almost all of the simulation-formal disagreement to reset and first-cycle comparison semantics. Second, on 274 mined model failures, the specification-only minus specification-conditioned recovery point estimate ranges from -8.5 to +18.3 percentage points across six models. Thus, a conventional repair score need not isolate whether the model used the faulty RTL. We translate these findings into evaluation controls: report initialization, reset, first-cycle, and unknown-value semantics; disclose oracle coverage and undecided cases; and include a specification-only baseline. Together, the resources and audit provide both a benchmark for behavioral repair and a protocol for diagnosing what contributes to its measured score. We release the benchmark, the training set, construction code, sanitized aggregate evidence, and reproduction materials at https://github.com/Evaaaz/RTLRepairBench.

arXiv:2610.28584v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autoregressive models (ARMs) face a "Sequentiality Bottleneck" in reasoning, while diffusion language models (DLMs) offer parallelism but lack semantic coherence. To addresses both limitations, we propose Collaborative Reasoning Asymmetric Learning (CoRAL), a hybrid framework via an Asymmetric Planner-Executor (APE) architecture: a DLM Planner generates K diverse reasoning trajectories in parallel, while a large ARM Executor selects the optimal plan and synthesizes the final answer. To train the Planner effectively, we introduce Reward-Guided Denoising for CoT (RDC), which integrates outcome-based rewards into the diffusion process to steer it toward goal-directed reasoning. Experiments on vision-language benchmarks show that CoRAL significantly outperforms prior diffusion-based methods and achieves competitive performance against strong ARMs, achieving both superior efficiency and quality.